Journal 6

My understanding of everyday writing thus far in the course is that it is something that must be un-institutionalized, have some kind of personal or sentimental meaning, and send a message to a particular audience.  After reading Morris’s article I believe that tombstones fulfill all of these criteria.  As Claire has pointed out, Morris describes tombstones as “patterns of communication with those who view/use them.”  It is clear from this statement that tombstones have and are directed towards a particular audience.  The audience for a particular tombstone may be a passing stranger admiring tombstones, or a close family member, or anyone who happens to be passing the tombstone and happens to look upon it.  Tombstones hold sentimental value because the way they are designed is directly linked to either the way that that particular person was viewed by those who loved them or it may portray the man or woman that the person was in life.  Immediately the tombstones affect would resonate with anyone who looked at it even for a second.  From the font that is on the tombstone to the design or pictures that are in it, it is almost impossible not to be affected by the message that a tombstone gives off.

It is very hard to find two tombstones that are identical and that is the largest reason as to why I believe that tombstones should be considered everyday writing.  This proves that it is not institutionalized.  How can something be taught that is always changing?  Tombstones, I believe are a unique part of our culture and have a very deep meaning to the loved ones of the deceased.