I was in the same boat as Jami when tombstones were being
considered everyday writing. I did not believe they fit the criteria but I can
see, now, that they do follow the criteria we discussed in class. The article
goes into a roundabout discussion of how tombstones and graveyards actually
hold a lot of information about the people who lived there. The individuality of each gravestone is a
great example of how they can be considered everyday writing. Gravestones are meant also to be the bridge
between the living world and the deceased. In that I mean that they serve to
capture what the creator of the stone, whether that’s the deceased’s family or
the deceased person him/herself, wants to capture about his or her life. Therefore they have an audience and a
purpose. They also have a rhetor. This
person is the person who decides what to put on the gravestone and therefore
what to capture about the deceased persons life. Often times it has to do with
their accomplishments as a family member or friend or occupation. The gravestone serves as a message to anyone
who knew the person or happens upon it while in a cemetery. The reading also talked about how the type
of gravestone and the messages it delivers.
The larger flashy one can be interpreted as someone who wants to be
remembered while the lower profile gravestones show more acceptance of death.
No comments:
Post a Comment