Tombstones and Richard Morris, through his article entitled “Death
on Display,” help us to understand that everyday writing involves a rhetorical
situation. In the case of death and tombstones, the problem in question is death,
and we, as humans, cope with this problem through “gravescapes,” which commemorate
a person who was lost, while also reminding future generations of the morals
and traditions of a past culture. Furthermore, “gravescapes” around the time of
colonization were exposed to a relatively local audience as they “were located
at the community’s center…and uniformly presented visitors” with a lasting
message that one’s time on this earth is limited and that a spiritual world
awaits us after death. Another element of everyday writing that is reflected in
tombstones and “gravescapes” is place/scene. The location of “gravescapes” is
often viewed by the living as a place of sanctity and a place that is not to be
disturbed. The sanctified locations of “gravescapes” determine the overall
setting and the mood with respect to the audience through the consequential
designation of an escape for the living from ephemeral temptations and the final
stage of the journey for the dead towards judgment. As Brandon mentioned in his
journal, tombstones are made to elicit a certain response, which is grief. However,
I would like to argue that although tombstones can initially be connected to an
individual’s grieving over a recently deceased loved one, over time that
tombstone’s visitor will most likely associate the tombstone with their memory
of their loved one. For most people, grief subsides after losing a loved one and
what remains are the memories that you have of that person. Often, a tombstone
or “gravescape,” among other things, can elicit these bittersweet memories.
No comments:
Post a Comment